Crystallographic
study of haloalkane dehalogenase
DpcA from Psychrobacter
cryohalolentis K5
Katsiaryna Tratsiak1,2*, Oksana Degtjarik1,2,6,
Tatiana Prudnikova1, Ivana Drienovska3,
Lukas Chrast3, Pavlina Rezacova4,5,
Michal Kuty1,2,6, Radka
Chaloupkova3, Jiri Damborsky3 and
Ivana Kuta Smatanova1,2,6
1 University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, CENAKVA and Institute of Complex Systems, Zamek 136, 373 33 Nove Hrady
2 University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Science, Branisovska
31, 370 05 České Budějovice,
Czech Republic
3 Loschmidt Laboratories, Department of
Experimental Biology and Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the
Environment, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5/A13, 625 00 Brno,
Czech Republic
4 Institute of Molecular
Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic v.v.i.,
Videnska 1083, 142 20 Prague 4, Czech Republic
5 Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of
the Czech Republic v.v.i., Flemingovo
nam. 2, 166 37 Prague, Czech Republic
6Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Institute of Nanobiology and Structural Biology GCRC, Zamek 136, 373 33 Nove Hrady, Czech Republic
*E-mail: tratsiak@frov.jcu.cz
Introduction
Haloalkane dehalogenases
(EC 3.8.1.5; HLDs) are microbial enzymes that catalyze the hydrolytic
conversion of halogenated aliphatic compounds to their corresponding alcohols [1,
2], which is the hydrolytic
dehalogenation accomplished by these enzymes is one of the most important steps
in the biodegradation of 1-halo-n-alkanes and α,ω-dihalo-n-alkanes,
serious halogenated pollutants [3]. HLDs have a broad substrate specificity [4]
and a high enantioselectivity [5], which makes these enzymes applicable in
bioremediation [6], in biosensing [7,8], biocatalysis [5, 9], cellular imaging,
and protein analysis [10, 11] . Understanding of the structural bases of the enzyme extremophilicity allows for the construction of HLD
variants with improved activity and stability at low and high temperatures and
thus enlarges their applicability in environmental and biosynthetic
applications.
Experimental
details
A
novel HLD enzyme, DpcA, exhibiting unique temperature profiles with
exceptionally high activities at low temperature, isolated from Gram-negative psychrophilic bacteria Psychrobacter cryohalolentis K5 [12] was crystallized by sitting-drop and hanging-drop vapour-diffusion
techniques. Crystallization drops were prepared by mixing 2 µl of protein solution at the
concentration 10 mg ml-1 in 50 mM Tris–HCl buffer pH 7.5 and 1 µl precipitant solution plus
0.3–0.6 µl
of 0.1 M L-proline. Diffraction data were collected at the beamline
14.2, Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin (HZB) (Germany) at the
BESSY II electron storage ring, detector Rayonics MX-225
CCD [13] at wavelengths of 0.978 A
˚. All diffraction experiments were
carried out in a liquid-nitrogen stream at 100 K using a Cryojet
XTL system (Oxford Instruments). The diffraction data for DpcA were
indexed, integrated and scaled by HKL-3000 [15]. Matthews coefficient was
calculated with MATTHEWS_COEF [15], using the the
CCP4 software package [16].
Results and
discussians
Crystals of
DpcA enzyme diffracted to the 1.05 Å resolutions and belonged to P21
(primitive monoclinic space group) with unit-cell
parameters a = 41.3, b = 79.4, c = 43.5 A ˚, α = β = 90.0,
γ = 95.0 and contained one molecule in the asymmetric unit [16].Structurally DpcA
is a member of the superfamily of α/β-hydrolase, molecular replacement with MOLREP [15] from the CCP4 software suite was used for structure solving.
Conclusions
The coordinates of Xanthobacter autotrophicus (PDB code:
1B6G; 40% sequence identities for 121 residues and 53% sequence similarity was
used as search model for DpcA structure. DpcA protein has a
globular shape and is composed of two domains. The core domain shows composed
of eight β-strands,
within one is antiparallel (β2). The central β-sheet
is flanked on both sides by α-helices:
four are on one side and two are on the other side of the sheet. The second
domain, the cap structure is located at the C-terminal end of the β-sheet and is composed of α-helices and covers the active site, which will be more reviewed in the
presentation. The structure of DpcA is consimilar to the others structurally known HLD.
Acknowledgements
We thank Manfred Weiss and Sandra Pühringer
for their assistance with data collection at the MX 14.2 BESSY beamline in Berlin. This work is supported by the Grant
Agency of the Czech Republic (P207/12/0775) and by the Ministry of Education of
the Czech Republic (CZ.1.05/2.1.00/01.0024 and CZ.1.05/2.1.00/01.0001). Support
of Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic is appreciated as well.
Refeneces
[1] Damborsky, J, Rorije, E., Jesenska, A., Nagata,
Y., Klopman, G., Peijnenburg,
W.J.G.M. (2001). Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 20, 2681–2689.
[2] Janssen, D. B., Dinkla,
I. J., Poelarends, G. J. & Terpstra,
P. (2005). Environ.
[3] Poelarends, G. J., Zandstra M., Bosma T., Kulakov L. A., Larkin M. J., Marchesi
J. R., Weightman A. J., and Janssen D. B. (2000). J. Bacteriol. 188, 2725-2731.
[4] Koudelakova, T., Chovancova, E., Brezovsky, J., Monincova, M., Fortova, A., Jarkovsky, J., Damborsky, J.
(2011). Biochem. J. 435, 345-354.
[5] Prokop, Z., Sato, Y., Brezovsky, J., Mozga, T., Chaloupkova, R., Koudelakova, T.,
Jerabek, Stepankova, P.,
V., Natsume, R., van Leeuwen
J. G. E. Janssen, D. B., Florian, J., Nagata, Y., Senda, T., Damborsky, J. (2010). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 6111-6115.
[6] Stucki, G., Thuer, M. (1995). Environ. Sci. Technol.
29, 2339–2345.
[7] Campbell, D.W., Muller, C., Reardon, K.F. (2006). Biotechnol.
Lett.
28, 883–887.
[8] Bidmanova, S., Chaloupkova, R., Damborsky, J., Prokop, Z. (2010). Anal. Bioanal.
Chem. 398, 1891–1898.
[9] Westerbeek, A.,
Szymanski, W., Feringa, B.L., Janssen, D. B. (2011). ACS Catal.
1, 1654–1660.
[10] Los, G.V., Wood, K. (2007). Methods Mol. Biol.
356, 195–208.
[11] Ohana, R.F., Encell, L.P., Zhao, K., Simpson,
D., Slater, M.R., Urh, M., Wood, K.V. (2009). Protein Expr. Purif. 68, 110–120.
[12]Drienovska, I., Chovancova, E., Koudelakova,
T., Damborsky, J. and Chaloupkova,
R. (2012). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78 (14), 4995-8.
[13] Mueller, U., Darowski,
N., Fuchs, M.R., Förster, R., Hellmig,
M., Paithankar, K.S., Pühringer,
S., Steffien, M., Zocher,
G., Weiss, M.S. (2012). J. Synchrotron Rad. 19,
442-449.
[14]
Minor, W., Cymborowski, M., Otwinowski,
Z. & Chruszcz, M. (2006). Acta
Cryst.
D62, 859–866.
[15] Matthews, B. W. (1968). J. Mol.
Biol. 33, 491–497.
[16] Tratsiak,K.,
Degtjarik, O., Drienovska,
I., Chrast, L., Rezacova,
P., Kuty, M., Chaloupkova,
R., Damborsky, J. and Kuta Smatanova, I. (2013). Acta Cryst. F69, 683-688.
[17] Vagin, A. and Teplyakov, A. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 22–25.
[18] Winn, M. D., Ballard, C. C., Cowtan,
K. D., Dodson, E. J., Emsley, P., Evans, P. R., Keegan, R. M., Krissinel,
E. B., Leslie, A. G. W., McCoy, A., McNicholas, S.
J., Murshudov, G. N., Pannu,
N. S., Potterton, E. A., Powell, H. R., Read, R. J., Vagin, A. and K. S. Wilson.
(2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 235-242.