Enantioselective conversion of 2,3-dichloropropanol by haloalcohol dehalogenase HheC: Design of non-selective catalyst
D. Bednář1, P. Dvořák12, Z. Prokop1,
J. Damborský12, and J.
Brezovský1
1Loschmidt Laboratories, Department of Experimental Biology and Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5/A13, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic;
2 International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Pekarska 53, 656 91 Brno, Czech Republic
222755@mail.muni.cz
TCP is widely
used persistent contaminant with a carcinogenic and toxic effect on living
organisms [1]. The conversion of 2,3-dichloropropanol
(DCP) to corresponding epoxide is the second step in
the dechlorination of 1,2,3‑trichloropropan
(TCP) to glycerol [2]. The haloalcohol dehalogenase HheC [3] catalyses
this second step in the TCP biodegradation pathway by cleaving-off the two
remaining chlorine atoms of the DCP. However, the enantioselectivity
of this reaction represents
significant problem in the biodegradation pathway since after convertion of (R)-DCP,
toxic (S)‑DCP
accumulates in the solution.
Only limited
knowledge about molecular principles of HheC enantioselectivity is available to date. Molecular docking
and quantum mechanics calculations were therefore employed to provide detailed
information about molecular basis of HheC enantioselectivity. Molecular docking revealed small
preference in binding of (R)-DCP over (S)‑DCP, which corresponds well with
experimental analysis. The two-step dehalogenation
reaction was proposed for conversion of DCP based on quantum mechanical
calculations, but no significant difference in the conversion of (R)- and (S)-DCP
was observed at the level of employed theory. Results from molecular docking
and quantum mechanics were complemented by FoldX
calculations [4] to identify several hot spots for saturation mutagenesis. Experimental construction of mutants and their
screening for enantioselectivity is currently
on-going in our laboratory.
This work was financially supported
by the European Regional Development Fund (CZ.1.05/2.1.00/01.0001 and CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0123), by the Czech Grant Agency (203/08/0114 and P503/12/0572), by
the Grant Agency of the Czech Academy of Sciences (IAA401630901) and by the Brno Ph.D. Talent Scholarship – Funded by the Brno City
Municipality. The access to computing
facilities owned by parties and projects contributing to the MetaCentrum and listed at
http://www.metacentrum.cz/acknowledgment/ is highly appreciated.
1. G. L. Weber & I. G. Sipes, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 113, (1992), 152-158.
2. T. Bosma, J. Damborský, G. Stucki and D. B. Janssen, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 68, (2002), 3582- 3587.
3. R. M. de Jong, J. J. W. Tiesinga, H. J. Rozeboom, K. H. Kalk, L. Tang, D. B. Janssen and B. W. Dijkstra. EMBO J., 22, (2003), 4933-4944.
4. R. Guerois , J. E. Nielsen and L. Serrano, J. Mol. Biol., 320, (2002), 369-387.