Diffraction stress analysis of grain interaction in polycrystalline materials
U. Welzel and
E. J. Mittemeijer
Max Planck
Institute for Metals Research – Heisenbergstraße 3 – 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
The elastic
behaviour of polycrystals depends upon the single-crystal elastic constants of
its constituents (grains), the crystallographic texture and the microstructure.
However, a straightforward calculation of the mechanical elastic constants
(relating mechanical (macroscopic) strains to mechanical (macroscopic)
stresses) and the diffraction elastic constants (diffraction stress factors for
elastically anisotropic samples), relating (diffraction) lattice strains to
mechanical stresses from single-crystal elastic compliances (or stiffnesses) of
the crystallites composing the specimen is generally not possible without more
ado. A so-called grain-interaction model can be adopted, describing the
distribution of stresses and strains over the crystallographically differently
oriented grains in the specimen.
Extreme cases
for grain interaction are given by the Voigt [1] and Reuss [2] proposals
(either the strain or stress tensors of all crystallites are taken equal to the
mechanical strain and stress tensors, respectively), which are generally
incompatible with physical reality but set bounds for the mechanical elastic
constants [3]. It is common to all traditional grain-interaction models (like
the extreme Voigt and Reuss models and the intermediate models as the
Neerfeld-Hill [3,4] and the Eshelby-Kröner [5-7] models) that they involve that
a polycrystal is mechanically elastically isotropic in the absence of
crystallographic texture, as the same grain-interaction assumptions are adopted
along all directions in the specimen. They can therefore be called isotropic
grain-interaction models [8]. However, even in the absence of crystallographic
texture, polycrystals cannot generally be considered as being mechanically
elastically isotropic. It can be anticipated that deviations from an isotropic
‘microstructure’ may have an impact on the elastic properties of polycrystals.
Two
microstructural features involving the occurrence of macroscopic elastic
anisotropy (even in the absence of crystallographic texture) have been recently
considered by the development of appropriate grain-interaction models: the
presence of a free surface in thin films, 'surface anisotropy', and
morphological (grain-shape) texture, which is also frequently encountered in
thin films. The mechanical and diffraction elastic constants can be calculated
employing recently developed grain-interaction models. As in such models
different grain-interaction assumptions are adopted along different directions
in the specimen, these models can therefore be called direction-dependent
grain-interaction models.
The present
paper presents an overview of recent work on the development of
direction-dependent elastic grain-interaction models and the diffraction
analysis of elastic grain interaction in polycrystalline material [8-12]. The extension
of the applicability of the newly developed grain-interaction models to the
plastic deformation regime will also be discussed on the basis of selected
examples.
[1] Voigt, W., 1910, Lehrbuch der Kristallphysik (Leipzig-Berlin: Teubner).
[2] Reuss, A., 1929, Zeitschrift für angewandte
Mathematik und Mechanik 9, 49.
[3] Hill, R., 1952, Proc. Phys. Soc. London 65, 349.
[4] Neerfeld, H., 1942, Mitt. K.-Wilh.-Inst.
Eisenforschg. 24, 61.
[5] Eshelby, J. D., 1957, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 241, 376.
[6] Kröner, E., 1958, Z. Physik 151, 504.
[7] Kneer, G., 1965, Phys. Stat. Sol. 9, 825.
[8] Welzel, U. & Mittemeijer, E. J., 2003, J. Appl. Phys. 93, 9001.
[9] van Leeuwen, M., Kamminga, J.-D. &
Mittemeijer, E. J., 1999, J. Appl. Phys.
86, 1904.
[10] Leoni, M., Welzel, U., Lamparter, P., Mittemeijer,
E. J. & Kamminga, J.-D., 2001, Philos.
Mag. A 81, 597.
[11] Welzel, U., Leoni, M. & Mittemeijer, E. J.,
2003, Philos. Mag. 83, 603.
[12] Koch, N., Welzel, U., Wern, H. &
Mittemeijer, E.J., 2004, submitted for publication.