CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF PHO4 bHLH DOMAIN-DNA COMPLEX

T. Shimizu1, A. Toumoto1, K. Ihara1, M. Shimizu2, Y. Kyogoku3, N. Ogawa4, Y. Oshima4 and T. Hakoshima1

1Department of Bioscience, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma, Nara 630-0101, Japan
2Biomolecular Engineering Research Institute, Furuedai, Suita, Osaka 565
3Institute for Protein Research, Osaka University, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565
4Faculty of Engineering, Osaka University, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565, Japan

Keywords: crystal structure, PHO4, basic-helix-loop-helix, E-box, flanking base recognition

The transcription of the genes relevant to phosphatase(PHO) system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are regulated by intracelluar levels of phosphate. PHO4 is a positive regulatory factor in this regulon and is to be indispensable for transcription of several genes. PHO4 consists of 312 amino acid residues and the C terminal region is a basic-helix-loop-helix(bHLH) DNA binding domain. The consensus sequence of the recognition is CACGT(G/T) known as E-box. Several studies(1,2) showed that bases outside the E-box were involved in determining the binding specificity in PHO4. Here, we have determined the 3D structure of a bHLH domain of PHO4, which is composed of 63 residues, complexed with DNA by X ray crystallography(3). The crystal structure at 2.8 A (revealed that the domain folds into a bHLH motif with a long but compact loop that contains a short -helical segment. This helical structure positions a Trp into an aromatic cluster so as to make the loop compact. PHO4 binds to DNA as a homodimer with direct reading of the core E box sequence but also of its 3'-flanking bases. The 3'-flanking bases GG are recognized by Arg2 and His5. The residues involved in the E-Box recognition are His5, Glu9, and Arg13, as already reported for bHLH/Zip proteins MAX and USF, and are different from those by bHLH proteins MyoD and E47, though PHO4 is one of the bHLH proteins.

  1. Fisher, F. and Goding, C.R. (1992) EMBO J. 11,4103-4109.
  2. Ogawa, N. et al. (1995) Mol.Gen.Genet. 249, 406-416.
  3. Shimizu, T. et al. EMBO J. 16 (15), 4689-4697