MOLECULAR STRUCTURE AND CONFORMATION OF NOVEL TETRADENTATE OPEN-CHAIN OXIME LIGANDS

I.O.Fritsky1, V.A.Kalibabchuk2, E.V.Prisyazhnaya1, T.Sliva1, T.Glowiak3, H.Kozlowski3

1Department of Chemistry, Shevchenko University, Kiev 252033, Ukraine
2Department of General Chemistry, National Medical University, Kiev 252004, Ukraine
3Faculty of Chemistry, University of Wroclaw, 50-383 Wroclaw, Poland

Three new open chain oxime-and-amide ligands, derivatives of alifatic diamines and 2-hydroxyiminopropanic acid: N,N'-bis(2-hydroxyimino-propionyl)-1,2-diaminoethane (1, n = 2); -1,3-diamino-propane (2, n = 3) and 1,4-diaminobuthane (3, n = 4) appeared to be a very efficient chelating agent for the Ni2+ and Cu2+ ions exhibiting both open-chain and pseudomacrocyclic co-ordination modes in the complexes [1]. As the number of the methylene groups and conformational behaviour of the ligands can impact critically on the donor ability, we have studied their crystal and molecular stucture.

In 1-3 the oxime groups are in trans-position in respect to the amide carbonyl, the amide bonds indicate trans-configuration. The molecule 1 (Fig.1) is centrosymmetric and consists of two planar parallel fragments linked by the C(4)-C(4a) bond that lies nearly perpendicular to the fragments (the torsion angle C(3)N(2)C(4)C(4a) = 85.4(2)o) thus forming the „double desk" conformation. The molecule 2 (Fig.2) indicates elongated conformation and consists of two nearly planar fragments CH3-C(=NOH)-C(O)NH-CH2- linked by the methylene group. The conformationally flexible fragment -(CH2)3- lies nearly in the plane of the amide group O(2)C(3)N(2)C(4) (the torsion angles C(3)N(2)C(4)C(5) = -176.2(2)o and N(2)C(4)C(5)C(4') = -171.9(2)o). The molecule 3 (Fig.3) possesses a planar „zig-zag"-like conformation with the torsion angles deviating no more than 8o from the values of 0o or 1800. The CH3-C(=NOH)-C(O)NH- fragments in 3 are slightly deviated from planarity because of turnover of the oxime and amide groups along C(2)-C(3) and C(2')-C(3') bonds (the dihedral angles are 4.6 and 6.7o, respectively). The conformation of both 1 and 3 is different from that of 2 exhibiting rather folded conformation with the dihedral angle between the planes of the fragments = 96.2o.

1. A.M. Duda , A. Karaczyn , H. Kozlowski, I.O. Fritsky, T. Glowiak , E.V. Prisyazhnaya, T.Yu. Sliva, J. Swiatek-Kozlowska, J.Chem.Soc., Dalton Trans., 1997, 3853.

Fig.1 Fig.2 Fig.3