A NOVEL HOMOLEPTIC NICKEL THIOLATE WITH A PENTAGONAL-PRISMATIC SULFUR FRAMEWORK

Amir H. Mahmoudkhani and Vratislav Langer

Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Göteborg University and Chalmers University of Technology, S-412 96 Göteborg, SWEDEN.
E-mail: amir@inoc.chalmers.se

 

Keywords: structure determination, nickel thiolate, polynuclear complex.

Complexes of nickel(II) with thiolate ligands have been attracted attention due to their unusual structures and properties. Furthermore, identification of redox-active Ni complexes with S-donor ligands in biological systems such as hydrogenases has stimulated interest in the chemistry of nickel thiolate complexes [1]. So far, several polynuclear complexes of nickel thiolates have been synthesized, and characterized by diffraction techniques. In theses complexes, involving bridged thiolates and planar NiS4 units, there is a great tendency to form tetramers [3], pentamers [3, 4], hexamers [5 - 9, 10] and even higher polymers [11]. To our knowledge, there are only two examples of nickel thiolates with pentagonal-prismatic sulfur framework [3, 4]. It has been proposed that in these structures, axial-equatorial configuration of the thiolate ligands alternate to minimize steric interactions. It has been also suggested that steric effects have a relative importance in determining the degree of aggregation of nickel thiolates.

In our ongoing efforts to elucidate the factors determining the formation of these complexes, we prepared pentakis[di-m-(diisopropylaminoethanethiolato)nickel] by interaction of diisopropylaminoethanethiol with nickel(II) chloride. Dark red-brown crystals of the complex were obtained from its solution in acetone after few weeks. The crystal structure of this novel homoleptic thiolate complex shows a pentanuclear array of nickel atoms linked by sulfur bridging ligands, without coordination of nitrogen atoms.

  1. R. Cammack: The Bioinorganic Chemistry of Nickel; J. R. Lancaster (Ed.), VCH, New York, 1988, Chapter 8.
  2. T. Krüger, B. Krebs, and G. Henkel: Angew. Chem. Int. Engl. 31 (1992), 54 - 56.
  3. M. Kriege, and G. Henkel: Z. Naturforsch. 42b (1987), 1121 - 1128.
  4. B. -K. Koo, E. Block, H. Kang, S. Liu, and J. Zubieta: Polyhedron, 7 (1988), 1397 - 1399.
  5. H. Miyamae, and T. Yamamura: Acta. Cryst. C44 (1988), 606 - 609.
  6. T. A. Wark, and D. W. Stephan: Organometallics, 8 (1989), 2836 - 2843.
  7. M. Capdevila, P. Gonzalez-Duarte, J. Sola, C. Foces-Foces, F. H. Cano, and M. Martinez-Ripoll: Polyhedron, 8 (1989), 1253 - 1259.
  8. H. Barrera, J. C. Bayon, J. Suades, C. Germain, and J. P. Declerq: Polyhedron, 3 (1984), 969 - 975.
  9. J. Sletten, and J. A. Kovacs: Acta Chem. Scand. 48 (1994), 929 - 932.
  10. H. Feld, A. Leute, D. Rading, A. Benninghoven, G. Henkel, T. Krüger, and B. Krebs: Z. Naturforsch. 47b (1992), 929 - 936.
  11. D. Fenske, and J. Magull: Z. Naturforsch. 45b (1990), 121 - 126.