COMPARISON OF INTERFACE QUALITY IN
EVAPORATED AND SPUTTERED Mo/Si MULTILAYERS FOR X-UV OPTICS
M. Jergel1, V. Holý2,
E. Majková1, . Luby1,
R. Senderák1, H.J. Stock3,
D. Menke3, U. Kleineberg3,
U. Heinzmann3
1 Institute of Physics, Slovak Academy of
Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 842 28 Bratislava Slovakia
2 Laboratory of Thin Films and
Nanostructures, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlárská 2, 611 37 Brno,
Czech Republic
3 University of Bielefeld, Faculty of
Physics, Postfach 1001 31, D-33501 Bielefeld, Germany
Keywords : multilayer, interface, X-UV optics, X-ray
reflectivity, diffuse scattering
Multilayers composed of a heavy refractory metal and a light
spacer element operate as Bragg reflectors for ultraviolet and
soft X-ray (X-UV) wavelength range. The interface quality plays a
crucial role to achieve a desired optical performance. The
electron-beam evaporation and sputtering are the most common
techniques to prepare multilayer X-UV optical elements. This
contribution deals with a comparison of the interface quality and
vertical replication of the interface profiles in Mo/Si
multilayer mirrors prepared by these two techniques.
The Mo/Si MLs were prepared by the UHV electron beam evaporation and dc magnetron sputtering. The evaporation started with Mo, the deposition rate being 0.01 nm/s. To increase the surface mobility of the adatoms, the Si(100) substrate was heated up to 160o C. The nominal ML period d=8.7 nm was deposited 50 times. The sputtered sample consisted of 50 bilayers, too, which were deposited on a float glass substrate in an Ar plasma with a partial pressure of 0.3 Pa, the ML period being 10.2 nm. The distance between target and substrate was 32 mm and the deposition rates were 0.59 nm/s and 0.38 nm/s for Si and Mo, respectively, Si being the first deposited layer.
The internal structure of the Si layers in both MLs was found
to be amorphous by X-ray diffraction while the Mo layers were
polycrystalline and strongly textured with the (110) planes
parallel to the surface. The interfaces were studied by the X-ray
reflectivity and diffuse scattering measurements at grazing
incidence on a high-resolution diffractometer equipped with a
double-crystal GaAs monochromator using CuK1
radiation. The reflectivity was evaluated by the Fresnel optical
computational code in the coherent scattering approximation and
provided basic ML parameters - ML period dMo+dSi,
individual layer thicknesses, relative thickness error D, and starting estimate of the rms
interface roughness s. The Mo5Si3-like
interlayers had to be considered in both MLs to obtain
satisfactory fits. The diffuse scattering distribution in the
reciprocal space was mapped by the detector, sample, and offset
scans which were evaluated within the distorted-wave Born
approximation (DWBA). The substrate was assumed as an undisturbed
system and the whole ML including the interface roughness was
considered as a disturbance. This calculation strategy of the
DWBA does not include the secondary processes and is equivalent
to the semikinematical method, well-known from the scattering
theory.
The Gaussian type of the self-correlation function with a correlation length x was supposed to be the same for all interfaces. The cross-correlation function of the interface profiles was described by an attenuation of the self-correlation function according to
where the parameter is related to the degree of the vertical
interface profile correlation (along z) and qx is the
lateral wavector transfer on the corresponding frequency
component of the interface roughness. This frequency-dependent
decay of the vertical interface correlation follows from the
kinetic roughening growth model. Numerical parameters of the
simulations are given in the following table.
sample | dMo[nm] | dMo5Si3 (Mo on Si) [nm] | dSi[nm] | dMo5Si3 (Si on Mo) [nm] |
d [nm] | D [%] | s [nm] | x [nm] | a [nm-1] |
evaporated | 1.94 | 1.94 | 3.88 | 0.97 | 8.73 | 3.5 | 0.45 | 80 | 0.5 |
sputtered | 4.89 | 1.80 | 2.80 | 0.70 | 10.19 | 2.5 | 0.50 | 98 | 0.02 |
The most distinct difference is that the parameter a is lower by more than one order of
magnitude for the sputtered sample which implies a lower degree
of the vertical interface conformality. As our sputtering system
at the Ar plasma pressure of 0.3 Pa was below the thermalization
threshold, the sputtered adatoms impinged on the surface
ballistically. A high energy of the sputtered adatoms, which
arrived at the surface at large velocities and migrated for long
distances before getting incorporated in an aggregate, together
with larger deposition rate resulted into a poorer replication of
the interface profiles in the sputtered ML. The surface diffusion
length of the sputtered adatoms was estimated to be 5 times
larger than that of the evaporated ones and is reflected also in
somewhat larger lateral correlation length x.
Except for a, other ML parameters are not affected dramatically by the preparation technique and the reflectivity on the 1st ML Bragg maximum reaches 70% in both MLs. Regarding the intensity, there is obviously no generally superior technique to prepare Mo/Si ML mirrors for X-UV optics. However, the X-rays diffusely scattered on vertically conformal interfaces undergo a constructive interference which results into concentration of the diffuse intensity around ML Bragg points in the reciprocal space. Such an effect is observable also in our results. Therefore, a higher conformality of the interfaces in the evaporated ML may have a rather detrimental effect on contrast if it is used X-UV imaging.